However, If your on the fence give it a try. No doubt, The MPC Touch is not for everyone. If a product doesn’t enhance or increase my workflow then I won’t buy it. When the MPC Touch was first released I thought it looked like a toy, gimmick or just something I couldn’t utilize. (There is a q-link edit and midi edit “Coming Soon” page in the Main Menu). AKAI PROFESSIONAL MPC TOUCH REVIEWS SOFTWAREAlso, Q-links should already be mapped like the Akai VIP software and Q-links need to be editable. No fun paging through four banks and trying to decipher which q-link does what. Where are the transport locate buttons? Bring those back asap! I don’t want to have to menu dive for functions that I often use like like Program edit, Channel Mixer, Pad Mixer, Sample Edit etc. I’m guessing they will show up on the MPC Touch Pro? I’ll mention a few of them.this post longer than I anticipated. There are several things that could be improved. Pad Perform, Looper and naming from the hardware work excellent too. It was just to hard to remember which q-link controlled which parameter.and using a mouse was exhausting. I always struggled trying to use the q-links to edit programs on the MPC Ren. Logically laid out and all parameters easily adjustable with q-links, data dial and plus/minus buttons. Program Edit on the MPC Touch is worth the purchase price alone. The whole process is much more intuitive, like using a stand alone MPC. So, essentially the MPC Touch makes it easy to concentrate on the MPC hardware/touch screen and not the computer. The beauty of the MPC Touch is you can use the q-links, data dial, or the plus/minus buttons to do the tasks that you don’t want to do with fingers. I’ve tried it with iPad apps, other touch OS's and I much rather prefer knobs. I’m not a fan of using my finger to edit parameters. My interest in the MPC Touch was the ability to see more information on the hardware and to be able to manipulate that information quickly. Whatever you select is immediately displayed. This is the strong point of the touch screen. Selecting Modes, Parameters, Fields, etc - No Lag. I wouldn’t use my finger to edit a waveform anyway. Sample Edit - There might be a slight delay, but not very bad at all. XYFX - There is a little lag visually, but it doesn’t seem to be audible. Hopefully, this can be sorted out in the very near future. With that said, you have to turn off mirroring if you have multiple displays or the MPC’s Touch screen will not operate properly. AKAI PROFESSIONAL MPC TOUCH REVIEWS PROI use an Apple Thunderbolt Display with a Retina Macbook Pro and the MPC Touch screen looks good to me. I don’t know the tech specs, resolution, etc. The Stand-The included stand slides on securely on the back and helps with the viewing angle of the touch screen. I typically don’t use the MPC sound card very often. It also feels like its plastic.Īudio IN/OUT - I haven’t used the audio in/out yet. I’m guessing this is by design since it has dual functions. It feels looser than the MPC Rens Data Dial. It could just be me.ĭata Dial - The Data Dial turns in increments or can be pushed (to select). I find myself accidentally always hitting an adjacent one. The only problem I have with them is either their depth or spacing. Q-Links - The Q-links are touch sensitive encoders. I prefer the MPC Ren buttons, but these may grow on me. The Buttons - All of the main buttons have a certain textured grip to them. The Pads - The pads are are very thick…nice! You don’t have to hit them as hard as the MPC Rens pads. I appreciate equipment made with metal it just feels more substantive than plastic. The Front - Feels like plastic with some sort of matte covering. Its very well put together and heavier than I expected. The first thing I noticed was the quality of the hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |